Whatever the reasons, the luxury prices down the situation, as long as the purchase of the luxury goods took place in China, relevant taxes will stay at home, thus boosting domestic employment or produce other coordination effect, it is a simple common sense. Therefore, the lower tariffs is only for the rich luxury point of view, not only narrow, and against common sense. Whether the rich spending, or poor consumer, is the power of the drive economic growth, the rich to foreign consumption, exciting is foreign related industry employment, and if in domestic consumption, whether foreign brand, or domestic brand, promote domestic development of relevant industries. For this, if a country's tax too high, make the rich choice to foreign consumption, of the entire economy is a lot of losses. Let more consumers in domestic consumption luxury is the only way of reduce domestic luxury prices will stay in domestic consumption. In a have to rack your brains stimulating consumption country, will grow the fastest luxury consumption group through the price leverage banished to abroad, this is foolish. And, if lower tariffs on luxury goods, some luxury prices for middle class in China will not unattainable, will stimulate the consumption of the middle of desire, and consumer groups expand, not only for foreign brands good, will also drive the development of domestic luxury brands, fully staffed, what is there against it? Much less, the (to crack) 15, tunnel mystery, some basic supplies, some very common international brand, also because taxes are too high and lead to price far outside the country than in cheap, some people even run last year guangdong to Hong Kong to buy life commodity, it speaks for itself. China commodity tax of the high and has become a serious structural problems. Therefore, to reduce more than luxury goods import tariffs, a large number of commodity tax reduced space and necessary. Pull the popularization of consumption, this is the root of the problem. (the author is CCTV "today's observation, commentators.) Four, luxury tax cuts everyday items should be more tax cuts-WuRui thrush China youth daily 2011 years on June 17, luxury goods import tariffs will be down, the Commerce Department said further lower import tariffs is the trend of The Times, the relevant government departments to have reached a consensus. Previously, there are reports that, Chinese visitors luxury consumption situation of the outflow of amazing. The world luxury association released recently data shows, it is estimated that by 2012, China's luxury consumption up to 14.6 billion dollars more, super Japan to become the world's first big luxury consumer. (" of the Beijing June 15,) from the ministry of commerce of going to tariffs, moderately lower tax rate of luxury goods related to prevent domestic strong foreign buying power loss, will be purchasing power to "rendition" back home. Will tell from abroad, mostly no tariffs on luxury goods, and even some high-end consumer goods also into the duty free commodity category. Because of domestic and foreign tax gap huge, so, the domestic passengers on foreign luxury consumption has a special liking. According to universal tax refund company recently published report, 2010 Chinese tourists in France duty-free goods purchase a total of 650 million euros (6.13 billion yuan), ranked the king of France shopping title. Data shows, Chinese visitors per capita amount of purchase, that is, on the same day in the same store consumption amount, up to 1300 euros (12300 yuan).
That duty free shop in China also opened a, is becoming a new consumption growth. The question now is whether the French shopping heaven, or hainan of the overall implementation of the "islands duty-free", or is to be implemented in the luxury goods tariffs, are facing higher income groups, low-income people can't afford even ticket, let alone run to a foreign country or has to buy duty free commodity. So since the so-called preferential tax, always to a few higher income groups tilt, basically and low-income people insulation. From the current situation, inadequate consumption, dormant domestic needs, is long plagued the country the economic development of important factors. The central bank released in March of the first quarter of 2011 savers, bankers, entrepreneurs questionnaire survey, only 14.2% of the residents tend to "more consumption", this is the lowest since the 1999 survey, consumption in the recent ten DuoNian appear to low. Investigate its roots, in addition to inflation, low income and social security lag reason outside, the more common goods heavy tax burden factors. In China in 2010, value added tax, consumption tax, tariffs, business tax and enterprise income tax of the five indirect taxation tax is as high as one hundred million yuan, accounting for 87% of the total amount of tax. Ordinary people may not feel in hand in these tax, actually for you to keep these enterprise early tax to the state, and then put the taxes in commodity prices on additional passed on to the consumer. For example, in store bought a set of 500 yuan of clothes, which includes the value added tax of 17% and 13% of the business tax; Each weight yuan of salt of the value added tax of $0.29 and $0.03 of city building duty; 40 yuan a ticket to the business tax with 12 yuan, 3 home a movie pay tax to reach $36, and so on. In this connection, we might as well reference system arrangement of duty-free goods, will expand to duty-free goods across the country of all goods, especially the residents in daily use, of course, let all the duty-free not reality, but may consider profits tax cuts, that commodity prices to the reasonable interval. Specific point speak, on the one hand, to all of the enterprise profits tax cuts, clean up the unreasonable fees; At the same time, greatly improved threshold, let low-income groups more surplus money. In addition, still should improve the salary standard, improve the social security and medical health system, remove the trouble back at home of vulnerable groups. But should simultaneously, can let ordinary common people's consumption will, from "low" get out of, to the consumer "climax for, also can ensure the tax system of the fair and justice, even more important, in low-income people can also enjoy the abundance of interest to the cake
No comments:
Post a Comment